Novak (novak) wrote,

  • Mood:

Theological Notebook--More Work on the Apocalyptic

Well, Andre Orlov gave me back the Odes of Solomon paper that I'd been dreading he'd rip up as slipshod work. Turns out what I thought he would think was me trying to con an A out of him with a paper that featured more words than needed for its ideas, he figured was an "A+" paper that now he tells me I have to:
a) publish.
b) re-write (well, not in this order), and
c) deliver at this fall's Society of Biblical Literature conference.

So now I imagine a scenario where, after reading my paper, the best people in this field of apocalyptic literature are asking me questions and I have to say, "Um... I'm actually a systematic theologian, and everything I know about this field I just read to you. So... no more questions?

Oi. So I guess I'll have to learn a lot more, if this scenario actually plays out. Andre thinks that I made some good connections, linking the Odes and the book of Revelation in ways that had escaped notice, and particularly that I'm digging out a kind of transformational mysticism in early Jewish Christianity that has gone unremarked. He also was wild about connections I noticed to Jewish "throne" or "merkavah" mysticism (focusing on the image of the throne of God) in this early Jewish Christian text. So I have to study his notes and try to clean up the puppy: just when I thought I was done with it....

Still, if I can get it published, all the better for my job applications a few years down the line. And all the better for me figuring out how to write publishable scholarship consistently. I want to get to that blessed point where I don't think it's a big deal. Right now, it's a big deal. Such a beginner.

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.