Novak (novak) wrote,
Novak
novak

  • Location:
  • Mood:
  • Music:

Theological Notebook/Random: AP Articles on the U.S. Bishop's Citizenship Guide and Teens Using IMs

A few goofy articles, though goofy for different reasons. The first article presses my annoyance-with-secularism button, of course. Could there be any way to make "having spiritual integrity within the political process" sound any more dorky? The other is just no big surprise to me from dealing with my high school students, who often used assumed names under IMs to have private conversations with me about ethical questions when they didn't want to reveal their identities (which I could figure out about 50% of the time anyway, tho' I didn't tell them that...).

Catholic Bishops Instruct Voters
Nov 14, 4:14 PM (ET)

By RACHEL ZOLL

BALTIMORE (AP) - Roman Catholic voters and lawmakers must heed church teaching on issues ranging from racism to abortion or risk their eternal salvation, U.S. bishops said Wednesday.

The bishops didn't recommend specific policies or candidates in the 2008 election, and emphasized that "principled debate" is needed to decide what bests promotes the common good. But they warned Catholics that their votes for politicians and laws affect more than just civic life.

"Political choices faced by citizens have an impact on general peace and prosperity and also may affect the individual's salvation," the bishops said. "Similarly, the kinds of laws and policies supported by public officials affect their spiritual well-being."

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops overwhelmingly adopted the statement, "Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship," as they ended the public session of their fall meeting.

They have offered similar guidance to Catholics before every presidential race since 1976.

While the 30-plus-page document touches widely on Catholic social justice teaching, the bishops said that fighting abortion should be a priority.

"The direct and intentional destruction of innocent human life is always wrong and is not just one issue among many," the bishops said. "It must always be opposed."

Catholics make up one-quarter of the electorate nationwide, but do not vote as a bloc, and often do not follow the bishops' political guidance. Surveys indicate that most don't choose candidates based on that person's position on abortion. In the current election season, none of the leading presidential candidates has been reliably anti-abortion.

The bishops said that voting for a candidate specifically because he or she supports "an intrinsic evil, such as abortion or racism" amounts to "formal cooperation in grave evil."

In some cases, Catholics may vote for a candidate with a position contrary to church teaching, but only for "truly grave moral reasons, not to advance narrow interests or partisan preferences," according to the statement.

The document did not address whether Catholics who violate this guidance should continue to receive Holy Communion. Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio, who helped draft the document, said the bishops are simply asking Catholics to "examine their consciences."

"When you look at eternal salvation, God is the only judge," said DiMarzio, of the Diocese of Brooklyn, N.Y. "All we have the ability to do is to warn people."

The document makes clear the broad concerns that keep Catholics from finding a true political home with either the Democrats or Republicans.

The bishops said helping the poor should be a top priority in government, providing health care, taking in refugees and protecting the rights of workers, and the bishops highlight the need for environmental protection.

However, they also opposed same-sex marriage, euthanasia and embryonic stem cell research, in addition to their staunch anti-abortion position.

The prelates, who oppose the death penalty, said torture is "always wrong," and expressed "serious moral concerns" about "preventive use of military force." But in a very brief floor debate Wednesday before the vote, they heightened their language on terrorism, adding a sentence acknowledging "the continuing threat of fanatical extremism and global terror."

In recent years, some independent Catholics groups have been distributing their own voter booklets, with theological conservatives emphasizing abortion and liberal-leaning groups highlighting church teaching on war, poverty and social justice.

The bishops urged Catholics to only use voter resources approved by the church.

------

On the Net:

U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops: http://www.usccb.org/


Poll: IMs Help Teens Avoid Embarrassment
Nov 15, 7:56 AM (ET)

By ALAN FRAM and TREVOR TOMPSON

WASHINGTON (AP) - Sure, instant messaging is fast and efficient. For many teenagers, it's also a great way to avoid those OMG moments - that's "omigod" - of mortifying face-to-face confrontations.

More than four in 10, or 43 percent, of teens who instant message use it for things they wouldn't say in person, according to an Associated Press-AOL poll released Thursday. Twenty-two percent use IMs to ask people out on dates or accept them, and 13 percent use them to break up.

"If they freak out or something, you don't see it," said Cassy Hobert, 17, a high school senior from Frenchburg, Ky., and avid IMer who has used it for arranging dates. "And if I freak out, they don't have to see it."

Overall, nearly half of teens age 13 to 18 said they use instant messaging, those staccato, Internet-borne strings of real-time chatter often coupled with enough frenzied multitasking to fry the typical adult brain. Only about one in five adults said they use IMs - though usually with less technological aplomb or hormone-driven social drama.

Danny Hitt, 34, a Riverside, Calif., real estate agent, says he has chatted with four or five IM buddies at once - a number some teens would consider embarrassingly low. He prefers the telephone for important communications.

"To me a significant conversation takes a phone call," Hitt said. "The inflection in the voice, you lose that" with instant messages.

Instant messaging's lack of physical proximity is exactly the point for those determined to avoid cringe-inducing episodes.

Take Lewis Grove, 19, a college sophomore from Heath, Ohio, who said he has used instant messages for both ends of the dating cycle.

"Fear of rejection - if you're face to face, you can't close out the window and disappear if you've been rejected" like you could if you were instant messaging, he said.

Grove said the IM breakup has its advantages, too.

"I've had some crazy ex-girlfriends. Saying that in person would probably not be the best idea for my physical safety," he said.

Among teenagers, about half of girls and more than a third of boys said they have used instant messages for things they wouldn't say in person.

Teens do not have sole rights to using instant messages for their personal lives. About eight in 10 adults who IM use it to send personal messages from work. About half of adult IMers say they log to IM on at least daily - slightly below the percentage of teens who do so that often.

Yet comparing the use and technical sophistication of instant messaging by teens and adults, while not quite like comparing Einstein to a walnut, is pretty one-sided.

Teens are far more likely to use many of the bells and whistles that have pushed IM programs well beyond the simple text message. They are at least twice as likely as adults to send IMs to a friend's phone, and to use them to share music or video files or to listen to music.

They are more likely than adults to use IM to chat with more than one person at a time, and to send photos or document files. And while three-fourths of adults say they send more e-mails than instant messages, nearly that many teens say they send more IMs.

Teens also dominate when it comes to high usage. One in 10 say they spend three hours or more a day instant messaging, about double the adult rate. Nearly a fifth, or 17 percent, send more than 100 IMs daily, about triple the number for adults.

"I could be practicing my viola or riding my bike," said Traci Laichter, 14, of Henderson, Nev., reciting her parents' efforts to wean her from her four hours daily of IMing. "I guess it makes sense, but oh well, I'd rather talk to my friends."

Nearly six in 10 teens say they research homework while IMing - a percentage many parents might find suspiciously low. Large numbers of people check e-mail and search the Internet while instant messaging, while a third to half of teens say while IMing they also upload photographs, download music or videos, listen to online radio or update their blogs or social networking profiles.

Adults outdo teens in only one activity while instant messaging - online shopping.

The poll also found less than a fifth of people use IM's abilities to have audio chats or view streaming video of the person they are messaging. Over half say they have received unsolicited IMs from somebody they don't know.

AOL, Yahoo Inc. (YHOO) and Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) have the most popular instant messaging programs, which collectively handle several billion IMs daily.

People reported IMing slightly less than they did in a similar AP-AOL survey last year. Industry analysts said they believe IM usage is growing, and said people could be confused about whether to include IMs sent from cell phones and web sites.

The online survey of 410 teens and 836 adults was conducted from Oct. 25-Nov. 5 by Knowledge Networks. The margin of sampling error was plus or minus 6 percentage points for teens and 4.3 points for adults.

---

AP news survey specialist Dennis Junius contributed to this report.
Tags: america, catholicism, hierarchy, political, random, students, theological notebook
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments